[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1667802195.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:28:04 -0600
From: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
These patches add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). There are two
sets of tests: range tests and NUMA tests. The range tests use a normal
(i.e., UMA) simulated physical memory and set the nid to NUMA_NO_NODE. The
NUMA tests use a simulated physical memory that is set up with multiple
NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of the NUMA tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE.
For the range tests, the TEST_F_EXACT flag is used to run the same set of
range tests used for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The NUMA tests have the
same setup as the corresponding test for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), but
several of the memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests fail to allocate
memory in setups where the memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test would
allocate memory. Also, some memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests drop the
lower limit of the requested range in order to allocate within the
requested node, but the same setup in a memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test
allocates within the requested range.
---
Changelog
v3 -> v4
Based on feedback from David Hildenbrand:
PATCH 1:
- alloc_nid_api.c:
+ Add assert to ensure that TEST_F_EXACT flag only occurs with
TEST_F_RAW flag
v2 -> v3
Based on feedback from David Hildenbrand:
PATCH 1:
- alloc_nid_api.c, alloc_nid_api.h, common.h:
+ Add TEST_F_EXACT flag so that tests in alloc_nid_api.c can be run
with that flag to test memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw()
- alloc_exact_nid_api.c:
+ Update to run range tests in alloc_nid_api.c with TEST_F_EXACT flag
instead of using a separate set of tests
- alloc_nid_api.c:
+ Rename tests and other functions by removing "_try" so that the
function names are general enough to refer to any of the
memblock_alloc_*nid*() functions of the memblock API
v1 -> v2
PATCH 0:
- Add missing memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw to subject line
---
Rebecca Mckeever (5):
memblock tests: introduce range tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for
memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
memblock tests: remove completed TODO item
tools/testing/memblock/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/memblock/TODO | 7 +-
tools/testing/memblock/main.c | 2 +
.../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c | 1113 +++++++++++++++++
.../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h | 25 +
tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 546 ++++----
tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h | 1 +
tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 2 +
8 files changed, 1428 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists