[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <742d9ff1-8af8-8fa1-4f37-4b50bd874e82@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:55:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: onenand: omap2: add dependency on GPMC
On 07/11/2022 09:44, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 04/11/2022 21:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> OMAP2 OneNAND driver uses gpmc_omap_onenand_set_timings() provided by
>> OMAP GPMC driver, so the latter cannot be module if OneNAND driver is
>> built-in:
>>
>> /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_omap2.o: in function `omap2_onenand_probe':
>> onenand_omap2.c:(.text+0x520): undefined reference to `gpmc_omap_onenand_set_timings'
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Fixes: 854fd9209b20 ("memory: omap-gpmc: Allow building as a module")
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> index 34d9a7a82ad4..fa94c514626d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Kconfig
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
>> tristate "OneNAND on OMAP2/OMAP3 support"
>> depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || (COMPILE_TEST && ARM)
>> depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
>> + depends on OMAP_GPMC || !OMAP_GPMC
>
> Why did you add !OMAP_GPMC?
>
> If OMAP_GPMC is not set we don't want to be able to build this driver correct?
It will build fine because of stubs, so building is not a problem. We
just want to forbid having this built-in if OMAP_GPMC is a module. The
question is whether this is a runtime dependency as well?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists