[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2jVXdX1Mx5eXAiB@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 10:52:29 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, stable@...nel.org,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <Cristian.Marussi@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] coresight: cti: Fix hang in cti_disable_hw()
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:23:26AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 07/11/2022 09:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:20:03AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > > commit 6746eae4bbaddcc16b40efb33dab79210828b3ce upstream.
> >
> > Isn't this commit 665c157e0204176023860b51a46528ba0ba62c33 instead?
>
> This was reverted in commit d76308f03ee1 and pushed in later
> with fixups as 6746eae4bbadd.
So which should be applied?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists