[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221107100204.7dm6shvaew6zmi34@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:32:04 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@...com>
Cc: nm@...com, vigneshr@...com, kristo@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Enable AM625 CPUFreq
On 01-11-22, 13:09, Vibhore Vardhan wrote:
> Apologies, resending because I botched the label in previous series.
> Please reply to this series rather than the one sent previously.
>
> Hi,
> This series enables CPUFreq for AM625. This version is a fixup and
> rebase of the patch series by Dave Gerlach on v6.1-rc3 [1].
>
> It updates the ti-cpufreq driver to support parsing of the speed grade
> value out of the JTAG_USER_ID register and adds necessary support code
> to use cpufreq-dt.
>
> The operating-points table that gets added support 200,400,600,800 for
> all variants and then 1GHz for the S Speed grade only and 1.25 for the T
> Speed grade only. 1.4GHz has been added in board specific dts file as it
> requires VDD_CORE to be at 0.85V.
>
> The latency between pre and post frequency transition was measured in
> CPUFreq driver for all combinations of OPP changes. The average value
> was selected as overall clock-latency.
>
> Tested on am62-sk board using manual frequency changes and then reading
> back frequency with k3conf, and this shows matching frequency to what
> was set.
>
> This should not impact existing K3 platforms that do not have operating
> points table defined.
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists