linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: Fix UniPhier SATA controller node names in example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c699e361-a8a3-c6d3-9db4-1e1d07fc6b5b@socionext.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:36:43 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: Fix UniPhier SATA controller node
 names in example

Hi Vinod,

On 2022/11/05 16:34, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 02-11-22, 08:14, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> On 2022/11/02 4:31, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Kunihiko Hayashi
>>> <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> On 2022/10/29 4:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:49:20PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>>>>>> The word "glue" is ambiguous for the controller node name.
> Should put
>>>>>> "sata-controller" instead of "ahci-glue" on the controller node.
>>>>>> And rename a phy node to "sata-phy".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     .../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> | 4
>>>>>> ++--
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git
>>>>>
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>>>>>
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
>>>>>> index a3cd45acea28..89b8b133777a 100644
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
>>>>> yaml
>>>>>> +++
>>>>>>
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
>>>>> yaml
>>>>>> @@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ additionalProperties: false
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     examples:
>>>>>>       - |
>>>>>> -    ahci-glue@...00000 {
>>>>>> +    sata-controller@...00000 {
>>>>>
>>>>> But is this really the SATA controller aka AHCI?
>>>>>
>>>>> In cases where we don't have a standardized name, I don't think it
> makes
>>>>> sense changing node names from one non-standard name to another.
>>>>
>>>> I see. This can't be named generic, so this change will drop.
>>>> And "sata-phy" in the same way.
>>>
>>> I think sata-phy is fine. It may not be added, but usb3-phy or
>>> pcie-phy are common already.
>> I understand. But of cource "phy" is also common, so I defer the change
>> from "phy" to "sata-phy".
> 
> Should it not be just phy@xxx does it really need to be foo-phy?

This change was pointed out in the previous review for our devicetree,
so I made this change in the devicetree, however, I think I can leave it
as "phy" until the properties that depend on "sata-phy" are defined.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi