Message-ID: <b365f15d-5e19-c99a-3356-c57a4f2d7df6@foss.st.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:18:44 +0100
From:   Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>
To:     Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
CC:     Etienne CARRIERE <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-stm32] [PATCH 3/3] nvmem: stm32: add OP-TEE support for
 STM32MP13x

Hi Fabrice,


Thanks for the review,

I am preparing a V2 with your remarks.


Patrick


On 11/3/22 14:18, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 10/28/22 16:52, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>> For boot with OP-TEE on STM32MP13, the communication with the secure
>> world no more use STMicroelectronics SMC but communication with the
>> BSEC TA, for data access (read/write) or lock operation:
>> - all the request are sent to OP-TEE trusted application,
>> - for upper OTP with ECC protection and with word programming only
>>    each OTP are permanently locked when programmed to avoid ECC error
>>    on the second write operation
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c | 450 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 446 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c b/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> index 6de565639d5f..dfdedbcca9b9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
>>   
>>   /* BSEC secure service access from non-secure */
>>   #define STM32_SMC_BSEC			0x82001003
>> @@ -25,14 +26,22 @@
>>   struct stm32_romem_cfg {
>>   	int size;
>>   	u8 lower;
>> +	bool ta;
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct stm32_romem_priv {
>>   	void __iomem *base;
>>   	struct nvmem_config cfg;
>>   	u8 lower;
>> +	struct device *ta;
>>   };
>>   
>> +struct device *stm32_bsec_pta_find(struct device *dev);
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_read(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +			       size_t bytes);
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +				size_t bytes);
>> +
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Please find some suggestions and few remarks here below.
>
> Adding prototypes could be avoided, by moving these new routines:
> - stm32_bsec_pta_find
> - stm32_bsec_pta_read
> - stm32_bsec_pta_write


ok


>
>>   static int stm32_romem_read(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>>   			    size_t bytes)
>>   {
>> @@ -173,15 +182,25 @@ static int stm32_romem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	} else {
>>   		priv->cfg.size = cfg->size;
>>   		priv->lower = cfg->lower;
>> -		priv->cfg.reg_read = stm32_bsec_read;
>> -		priv->cfg.reg_write = stm32_bsec_write;
>> +		if (cfg->ta) {
>> +			priv->ta = stm32_bsec_pta_find(dev);
>> +			/* wait for OP-TEE client driver to be up and ready */
>> +			if (!priv->ta)
>> +				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +
>> +			priv->cfg.reg_read = stm32_bsec_pta_read;
>> +			priv->cfg.reg_write = stm32_bsec_pta_write;
>> +		} else {
>> +			priv->cfg.reg_read = stm32_bsec_read;
>> +			priv->cfg.reg_write = stm32_bsec_write;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(devm_nvmem_register(dev, &priv->cfg));
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> - * STM32MP15 BSEC OTP regions: 4096 OTP bits (with 3072 effective bits)
>> + * STM32MP15/13 BSEC OTP regions: 4096 OTP bits (with 3072 effective bits)
>>    * => 96 x 32-bits data words
>>    * - Lower: 1K bits, 2:1 redundancy, incremental bit programming
>>    *   => 32 (x 32-bits) lower shadow registers = words 0 to 31
>> @@ -191,6 +210,13 @@ static int stm32_romem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   static const struct stm32_romem_cfg stm32mp15_bsec_cfg = {
>>   	.size = 384,
>>   	.lower = 32,
>> +	.ta = false,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct stm32_romem_cfg stm32mp13_bsec_cfg = {
>> +	.size = 384,
>> +	.lower = 32,
>> +	.ta = true,
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct of_device_id stm32_romem_of_match[] = {
>> @@ -198,6 +224,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id stm32_romem_of_match[] = {
>>   		.compatible = "st,stm32mp15-bsec",
>>   		.data = (void *)&stm32mp15_bsec_cfg,
>>   	}, {
>> +		.compatible = "st,stm32mp13-bsec",
>> +		.data = (void *)&stm32mp13_bsec_cfg,
>>   	},
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_romem_of_match);
>> @@ -209,7 +237,421 @@ static struct platform_driver stm32_romem_driver = {
>>   		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stm32_romem_of_match),
>>   	},
>>   };
>> -module_platform_driver(stm32_romem_driver);
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OPTEE)
>> +/*************************************************************************
>> + * BSEC PTA : OP-TEE client driver to pseudo trusted application
>> + *************************************************************************/
> Just suggesting: could improve readability on above comment ?
> (mutli-line comment starting with an emtpy /*. But here there's a single
> line.

I remove this comment (not needed).


>
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Read OTP memory
>> + *
>> + * [in]		value[0].a		OTP start offset in byte
>> + * [in]		value[0].b		Access type (0 : shadow,
>> + *					1 : fuse, 2 : lock)
> Suggestion: fits into 100 chars line

done


>
>> + * [out]	memref[1].buffer	Output buffer to store read values
>> + * [out]	memref[1].size		Size of OTP to be read
>> + *
>> + * Return codes:
>> + * TEE_SUCCESS - Invoke command success
>> + * TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS - Incorrect input param
>> + */
>> +#define PTA_BSEC_READ_MEM		0x0 /* Read OTP */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Write OTP memory
>> + *
>> + * [in]		value[0].a		OTP start offset in byte
>> + * [in]		value[0].b		Access type (0 : shadow,
>> + *					1 : fuse, 2 : lock)
> same here


done


>
>> + * [in]		memref[1].buffer	Input buffer to read values
>> + * [in]		memref[1].size		Size of OTP to be written
>> + *
>> + * Return codes:
>> + * TEE_SUCCESS - Invoke command success
>> + * TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS - Incorrect input param
>> + */
>> +#define PTA_BSEC_WRITE_MEM		0x1	/* Write OTP */
>> +
>> +/* value of PTA_BSEC access type = value[in] b */
>> +#define SHADOW_ACCESS	0
>> +#define FUSE_ACCESS	1
>> +#define LOCK_ACCESS	2
>> +
>> +/* Bitfield definition for LOCK status */
>> +#define LOCK_PERM			BIT(30)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv - OP-TEE BSEC TA private data
>> + * @ctx:		OP-TEE context handler.
>> + * @session_id:		TA session identifier.
>> + */
>> +struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv {
>> +	struct tee_context *ctx;
>> +	u32 session_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Check whether this driver supports the BSEC TA in the TEE instance
>> + * represented by the params (ver/data) to this function.
>> + */
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Currently this driver only supports GP compliant, OP-TEE based TA
>> +	 */
> /* suggestion: single line comment */


done


>
>> +	if ((ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_OPTEE) &&
>> +		(ver->gen_caps & TEE_GEN_CAP_GP))
>> +		return 1;
>> +	else
>> +		return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32_bsec_pta_probe() - initialize the PTA BSEC
>> + * @dev: the platform_device description.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + *	On success, 0. On failure, -errno.
>> + */
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_probe(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int rc;
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg;
>> +	struct tee_client_device *tee_device = to_tee_client_device(dev);
>> +	struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv *priv;
>> +
>> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!priv)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Open context with TEE driver */
>> +	priv->ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, stm32_bsec_pta_match, NULL, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->ctx)) {
>> +		if (PTR_ERR(priv->ctx) == -ENOENT)
>> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: tee_client_open_context failed\n", __func__);
>> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->ctx);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Open a session with BSEC TA */
>> +	memset(&sess_arg, 0, sizeof(sess_arg));
>> +	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &tee_device->id.uuid);
>> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL;
>> +	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
>> +
>> +	rc = tee_client_open_session(priv->ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
>> +	if ((rc < 0) || (sess_arg.ret != 0)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: tee_client_open_session failed, err=%x\n",
>> +			__func__, sess_arg.ret);
>> +		rc = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_tee_session;
>> +	}
>> +	priv->session_id = sess_arg.session;
>> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +out_tee_session:
>> +	tee_client_close_context(priv->ctx);
>> +	priv->ctx = NULL;
>> +
>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32_bsec_pta_remove() - remove the BSEC TEE device
>> + * @dev: the platform_device description.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + *	0 always.
>> + */
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_remove(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->ctx)) {
>> +		tee_client_close_session(priv->ctx, priv->session_id);
>> +		tee_client_close_context(priv->ctx);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32_bsec_pta_read() - nvmem read access using PTA client driver
>> + * @context: nvmem context => romem privdate data
>> + * @offset: nvmem offset
>> + * @buf: buffer to fill with nvem values
>> + * @bytes: number of bytes to read
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + *	On success, 0. On failure, -errno.
>> + */
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_read(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +			       size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_romem_priv *romem_priv = context;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv *priv;
>> +	struct tee_shm *shm;
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[2];
>> +	u8 *shm_buf;
>> +	u32 start, num_bytes;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	dev = romem_priv->ta;
>> +	if (!dev) {
>> +		pr_err("TA_BSEC invoke with driver\n");
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +	memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
>> +	memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
>> +
>> +	arg.func = PTA_BSEC_READ_MEM;
>> +	arg.session = priv->session_id;
>> +	arg.num_params = 2;
>> +
>> +	/* align access on 32bits */
>> +	start = ALIGN_DOWN(offset, 4);
>> +	num_bytes = round_up(offset + bytes - start, 4);
>> +	param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
>> +	param[0].u.value.a = start;
>> +	param[0].u.value.b = SHADOW_ACCESS;
>> +
>> +	shm = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(priv->ctx, num_bytes);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(shm))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(shm);
>> +
>> +	param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT;
>> +	param[1].u.memref.shm = shm;
>> +	param[1].u.memref.size = num_bytes;
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(priv->ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "TA_BSEC invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +	if (!ret) {
>> +		shm_buf = tee_shm_get_va(shm, 0);
>> +		if (IS_ERR(shm_buf)) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "tee_shm_get_va failed for transmit\n");
>> +			ret = PTR_ERR(shm_buf);
>> +		} else {
>> +			ret = 0;
> ret = 0; maybe removed ? (ret is already 0 here)


yes => line removed


>
>> +			/* read data from 32 bits aligned buffer */
>> +			memcpy(buf, &shm_buf[offset % 4], bytes);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tee_shm_free(shm);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32_bsec_pta_write() - nvmem write access using PTA client driver
>> + * @context: nvmem context => romem privdate data
>> + * @offset: nvmem offset
>> + * @buf: buffer with nvem values
>> + * @bytes: number of bytes to write
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + *	On success, 0. On failure, -errno.
>> + */
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +				size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_romem_priv *romem_priv = context;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	struct stm32_bsec_pta_priv *priv;
>> +	struct tee_shm *shm;
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> +	struct tee_param param[2];
>> +	u8 *shm_buf;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	dev = romem_priv->ta;
>> +	if (!dev) {
>> +		pr_err("TA_BSEC invoke with driver\n");
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Allow only writing complete 32-bits aligned words */
>> +	if ((bytes % 4) || (offset % 4))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> +	memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
>> +	memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
>> +
>> +	arg.func = PTA_BSEC_WRITE_MEM;
>> +	arg.session = priv->session_id;
>> +	arg.num_params = 2;
>> +
>> +	param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
>> +	param[0].u.value.a = offset;
>> +	param[0].u.value.b = FUSE_ACCESS;
>> +
>> +	shm = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(priv->ctx, bytes);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(shm))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(shm);
>> +
>> +	param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT;
>> +	param[1].u.memref.shm = shm;
>> +	param[1].u.memref.size = bytes;
>> +
>> +	shm_buf = tee_shm_get_va(shm, 0);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(shm_buf)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "tee_shm_get_va failed for transmit\n");
> Need to add error handling: tee_shm_free(shm);

done => line added


>
>> +		return PTR_ERR(shm_buf);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	memcpy(shm_buf, buf, bytes);
>> +
>> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(priv->ctx, &arg, param);
>> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "TA_BSEC invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +			arg.ret, ret);
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +	dev_dbg(dev, "Write OTPs %d to %d, ret=%d\n",
>> +		offset / 4, (offset + bytes) / 4, ret);
>> +
>> +	/* Lock the upper OTPs with ECC protection, word programming only */
>> +	if (!ret && ((offset + bytes) >= (romem_priv->lower * 4))) {
>> +		u32 start, nb_lock;
>> +		u32 *lock = (u32 *)shm_buf;
>> +		int i;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * don't lock the lower OTPs, no ECC protection and incremental
>> +		 * bit programming, a second write is allowed
>> +		 */
>> +		start = max_t(u32, offset, romem_priv->lower * 4);
>> +		nb_lock = (offset + bytes - start) / 4;
>> +
>> +		param[0].u.value.a = start;
>> +		param[0].u.value.b = LOCK_ACCESS;
>> +		param[1].u.memref.size = nb_lock * 4;
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < nb_lock; i++)
>> +			lock[i] = LOCK_PERM;
>> +
>> +		ret = tee_client_invoke_func(priv->ctx, &arg, param);
>> +		if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "TA_BSEC invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n",
>> +				arg.ret, ret);
>> +			if (!ret)
>> +				ret = -EIO;
>> +		}
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Lock upper OTPs %d to %d, ret=%d\n",
>> +			start / 4, start / 4 + nb_lock, ret);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tee_shm_free(shm);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct tee_client_device_id stm32_bsec_id_table[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		UUID_INIT(0x94cf71ad, 0x80e6, 0x40b5,
>> +			  0xa7, 0xc6, 0x3d, 0xc5, 0x01, 0xeb, 0x28, 0x03)
>> +	},
>> +	{ }
>> +};
>> +
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(tee, stm32_bsec_id_table);
>> +
>> +static struct tee_client_driver stm32_bsec_pta_driver = {
>> +	.id_table	= stm32_bsec_id_table,
>> +	.driver		= {
>> +		.name = "stm32-bsec-pta",
>> +		.bus = &tee_bus_type,
>> +		.probe = stm32_bsec_pta_probe,
>> +		.remove = stm32_bsec_pta_remove,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void stm32_bsec_put_device(void *data)
>> +{
>> +	put_device(data);
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct device *stm32_bsec_pta_find(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *pta_dev;
>> +
>> +	pta_dev = driver_find_next_device(&stm32_bsec_pta_driver.driver, NULL);
>> +
>> +	if (pta_dev && devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, stm32_bsec_put_device, pta_dev)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to register cleanup action\n");
> I suggest to improve the error message here, to make it more explicit,
> and also propagate the error code to the caller.
> Something like:
> ret = devm_add_action_or_reset()
> if (ret) {
>      dev_err(dev, "devm_add_action_or_reset() failed (%d)\n", ret );
>      return ret;
> }
> This may avoid turning a real error here, into a EPROBE_DEFER at the
> caller side, e.g.:
> 	if (!priv->ta)
> 		return -EPROBE_DEFER;


Yes: no need to probe defer if a error is detected:


staticstructdevice *stm32_bsec_pta_find(structdevice *dev)
{
structdevice *pta_dev;
intret;
pta_dev = driver_find_next_device(&stm32_bsec_pta_driver.driver, NULL);
if(pta_dev) {
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, stm32_bsec_put_device, pta_dev);
if(ret)
dev_err(dev, "devm_add_action_or_reset() failed (%d)\n", ret );
returnERR_PTR(ret);
}
returnpta_dev;
}
and for caller side:
priv->ta= stm32_bsec_pta_find(dev);
/* wait for OP-TEE client driver to be up and ready */
if(!priv->ta)
return-EPROBE_DEFER;
if(IS_ERR(priv->ta))
returnPTR_ERR(priv->ta);


>
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Fabrice
>
>> +
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return pta_dev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_read(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +			       size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> +	pr_debug("%s: TA BSEC request without OPTEE support\n", __func__);
>> +
>> +	return -ENXIO;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stm32_bsec_pta_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>> +				size_t bytes)
>> +{
>> +	pr_debug("%s: TA BSEC request without OPTEE support\n", __func__);
>> +
>> +	return -ENXIO;
>> +}
>> +
>> +struct device *stm32_bsec_pta_find(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	pr_debug("%s: TA BSEC request without OPTEE support\n", __func__);
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static int __init stm32_romem_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	rc = platform_driver_register(&stm32_romem_driver);
>> +	if (rc)
>> +		return rc;
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OPTEE)
>> +	rc = driver_register(&stm32_bsec_pta_driver.driver);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit stm32_romem_exit(void)
>> +{
>> +	platform_driver_unregister(&stm32_romem_driver);
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OPTEE)
>> +	driver_unregister(&stm32_bsec_pta_driver.driver);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(stm32_romem_init);
>> +module_exit(stm32_romem_exit);
>>   
>>   MODULE_AUTHOR("Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>");
>>   MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics STM32 RO-MEM");

Powered by blists - more mailing lists