[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2jtqYCoaB5JQ5f9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:36:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] serial: 8250_lpss: Configure DMA also w/o DMA filter
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:07:06PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> If the platform doesn't use DMA device filter (as is the case with
> Elkhart Lake), whole lpss8250_dma_setup() setup is skipped. This
> results in skipping also *_maxburst setup which is undesirable.
> Refactor lpss8250_dma_setup() to configure DMA even if filter is not
> setup.
...
> + if (!lpss->dma_param.dma_dev) {
> + dma = port->dma;
> + goto confonly;
Perhaps
if (dma)
goto out_configuration_only;
return 0;
(note the label naming as well).
> + }
...
> +confonly:
> + if (dma) {
But you know that previous code has dma != NULL. See above.
> + dma->rxconf.src_maxburst = lpss->dma_maxburst;
> + dma->txconf.dst_maxburst = lpss->dma_maxburst;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists