[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABTCjFBth=jON-uuMU54cQi3zDcGYtGMbpaKitc1WHx+ciNiRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:24:44 +0300
From: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sagit: add initial device tree
for sagit
Is the master branch of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
proper rebase?
Or do I need to search and apply device tree doc patches somehow
before running dtbs_check?
I rebased on linux-next/master, and my dts is ok.
A lot of warnings for msm8998.dtsi, though. I think it should be fixed
in a separate patch series.
ср, 2 нояб. 2022 г. в 22:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>
> On 02/11/2022 11:55, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> > New device support - Xiaomi Mi6 phone
> >
> > What works:
> > - storage
> > - usb
> > - power regulators
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> (...)
>
> > +
> > +&blsp1_i2c5_sleep {
> > + /delete-property/ bias-pull-up;
> > + bias-disable;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&blsp1_uart3 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + bluetooth {
> > + compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> > +
> > + vddio-supply = <&vreg_s4a_1p8>;
> > + vddxo-supply = <&vreg_l7a_1p8>;
> > + vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l17a_1p3>;
> > + vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l25a_3p3>;
> > + max-speed = <3200000>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&blsp1_uart3_on {
> > + rx {
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
> Thank you.
>
> 6.1-rc3 is not a proper rebase... You *must* include maintainers'
> entries. This *must* align with stuff has Bjorn. Also I expect it passes
> dtbs_check on stuff in the next.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists