[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62da3373-c8c9-1dc1-5938-d6bdc9fb2d84@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:42:47 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <michael@...le.cc>, <pratyush@...nel.org>
CC: <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Takahiro.Kuwano@...ineon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mtd: spi-nor: add generic flash driver
On 11/1/22 10:46, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 8/11/22 01:06, Michael Walle wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
>> @@ -1632,6 +1632,16 @@ static const struct spi_nor_manufacturer *manufacturers[] = {
>> &spi_nor_xmc,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct flash_info spi_nor_generic_flash = {
>> + .name = "spi-nor-generic",
>
> How about "jedec,spi-nor" instead? The series looks good, I intend to test it
> and apply it soon.
>
Pratyush, do you agree with the change proposed, s/spi-nor-generic/jedec,spi-nor.
Michael seems busy and I'd like to progress with this.
Thanks,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists