[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2kgC9QlBwvXTLe6@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:11:07 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] arm64/sysreg: Convert SPE registers to automatic
generation
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 10:55:03AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Convert all the SPE register defines to automatic generation. No
> functional changes.
>
> New registers and fields for SPEv1.2 are added with the conversion.
>
> Some of the PMBSR MSS field defines are kept as the automatic generation
> has no way to create multiple names for the same register bits. The
> meaning of the MSS field depends on other bits.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> +Sysreg PMSNEVFR_EL1 3 0 9 9 1
> +Field 63:0 E
> +EndSysreg
JFTR as noted last time this looks nothing like the spec but is clearly
a sensible interpretation.
I do note that one advantage of doing this register by register rather
than en masse is that it makes it a lot easier to avoid re-reviewing the
same register...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists