linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v28 05/11] soc: mediatek: refine code to use mtk_mmsys_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58d55016-afc7-e560-32cf-8228794b5752@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:37:19 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     "Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, linux@...ck-us.net,
        nfraprado@...labora.com
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        "jason-jh . lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        singo.chang@...iatek.com,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 05/11] soc: mediatek: refine code to use
 mtk_mmsys_update_bits API



On 07/11/2022 08:22, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> Simplify code for update  mmsys reg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 45 ++++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> index 9a327eb5d9d7..73c8bd27e6ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
> @@ -99,22 +99,27 @@ struct mtk_mmsys {
>   	struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
>   };
>   
> +static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
> +{
> +	u32 tmp;
> +
> +	tmp = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + offset);
> +	tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | (val & mask);

I'm not sure about the change in the implementation of mtk_mmsys_update_bits(). 
Nicolas tried to explain it to me on IRC but I wasn't totally convincing. As we 
have to go for at least another round of this patches, I'd like to get a clear 
understanding while it is needed that val bits are set to 1 in the mask.

Regards,
Matthias

> +	writel_relaxed(tmp, mmsys->regs + offset);
> +}
> +
>   void mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect(struct device *dev,
>   			   enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
>   			   enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
>   {
>   	struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   	const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
> -	u32 reg;
>   	int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
> -		if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp) {
> -			reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
> -			reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
> -			reg |= routes[i].val;
> -			writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
> -		}
> +		if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp)
> +			mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr, routes[i].mask,
> +					      routes[i].val);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect);
>   
> @@ -124,27 +129,14 @@ void mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect(struct device *dev,
>   {
>   	struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   	const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes = mmsys->data->routes;
> -	u32 reg;
>   	int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < mmsys->data->num_routes; i++)
> -		if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp) {
> -			reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
> -			reg &= ~routes[i].mask;
> -			writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);
> -		}
> +		if (cur == routes[i].from_comp && next == routes[i].to_comp)
> +			mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, routes[i].addr, routes[i].mask, 0);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect);
>   
> -static void mtk_mmsys_update_bits(struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys, u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
> -{
> -	u32 tmp;
> -
> -	tmp = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + offset);
> -	tmp = (tmp & ~mask) | val;
> -	writel_relaxed(tmp, mmsys->regs + offset);
> -}
> -
>   void mtk_mmsys_ddp_dpi_fmt_config(struct device *dev, u32 val)
>   {
>   	if (val)
> @@ -161,18 +153,13 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned l
>   {
>   	struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_mmsys, rcdev);
>   	unsigned long flags;
> -	u32 reg;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
>   
> -	reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
> -
>   	if (assert)
> -		reg &= ~BIT(id);
> +		mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), 0);
>   	else
> -		reg |= BIT(id);
> -
> -	writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
> +		mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), BIT(id));
>   
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);
>