[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221108182135.GD3907045@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:21:35 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] sched: Add helper kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum()
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:00:56PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/4/2022 7:41 PM, Zhen Lei wrote:
> > Similar to kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(), it counts the sum of all software
> > interrupts on a specified CPU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
> > index 90e2fdc17d79ff8..898076e173a928a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,17 @@ static inline unsigned int kstat_softirqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
> > return kstat_cpu(cpu).softirqs[irq];
> > }
>
> One header comment would have been good.
No argument, except that the other functions in this file are also quite
innocent of header comments. :-/
I have no idea what the maintainer(s) of this code would think of a
separate patch supplying the header comments.
> > +static inline unsigned int kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + unsigned int sum = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++)
> > + sum += kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, cpu);
> > +
> > + return sum;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Number of interrupts per specific IRQ source, since bootup
> > */
>
> LGTM.
> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Applied all three, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists