[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221108111716.4b8c9246152c2addc2329a8f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:17:16 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Rustam Kovhaev <rkovhaev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecating and removing SLOB
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 18:18:46 +0000 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
> Mark them as dependent on CONFIG_BROKEN ?
For SLOB at least, yes. Leave it a couple of cycles and unless someone
comes out with a really really really good reason for retaining, away
it goes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists