linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom,rpmh-rsc: Update to allow for generic nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:34:01 -0800
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: qcom,rpmh-rsc: Update to allow
 for generic nodes



On 10/27/2022 8:08 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote:
>> Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of
>> device-specific node names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
>> index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml
>> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties:
>>      $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml#
>>  
>>  patternProperties:
>> -  '-regulators$':
>> +  'regulators$':
> This should be rather fixed like:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Got it.

Thanks,
Melody
>
> I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model
> names as device node names...