linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] eventpoll: add support for min-wait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdawNGXhW0DEf0-R6--1bDh7qByO=ViD_h=BfRe3XaFkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:25:05 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] eventpoll: add support for min-wait

> > This would be similar to the approach that willemb@...gle.com used
> > when introducing epoll_pwait2.
>
> I have, see other replies in this thread, notably the ones with Stefan
> today. Happy to do that, and my current branch does split out the ctl
> addition from the meat of the min_wait support for this reason. Can't
> seem to find a great way to do it, as we'd need to move to a struct
> argument for this as epoll_pwait2() is already at max arguments for a
> syscall. Suggestions more than welcome.

Expect an array of two timespecs as fourth argument?