linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locking: fix kernel/locking/ inline asm error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2rayPgDfL2NYcjQ@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:40:08 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     guoj17@...natelecom.cn
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com, trix@...hat.com, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        huyd12@...natelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking: fix kernel/locking/ inline asm error

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 02:01:26PM +0800, guoj17@...natelecom.cn wrote:
> From: Guo Jin <guoj17@...natelecom.cn>
> 
> When compiling linux 6.1.0-rc3 configured with CONFIG_64BIT=y
> and CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS=y on x86_64 using LLVM 11.0,
> an error: "<inline asm> error: changed section flags for
> .spinlock.text, expected:: 0x6" occurred.
> 
> The reason is the .spinlock.text in kernel/locking/qspinlock.o
> is used many times, but its flags are omitted in subsequent use.
> 
> LLVM 11.0 assembler didn't permit to
> leave out flags in subsequent uses of the same sections.
> 
> So this patch adds the corresponding flags to avoid above error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Jin <guoj17@...natelecom.cn>

Right, my reverse bisect tells me that this error was fixed by [1] in
LLVM, which landed in 12.0.0 and was backported to LLVM 11.0.1 [2].

We could bump the minimum supported version of LLVM for building the
kernel to 11.0.1 over this, just to avoid further issues like this down
the road, as the kernel will always be adding new sections for various
things. That change would not appear to be disruptive, as all the major
distros either have 11.0.1 or newer or older than the current minimum of
11.0.0, so they need to get clang from elsewhere already.

archlinux:latest: clang version 14.0.6

debian:oldoldstable-slim: clang version 3.8.1-24 (tags/RELEASE_381/final)
debian:oldstable-slim: clang version 7.0.1-8+deb10u2 (tags/RELEASE_701/final)
debian:stable-slim: Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
debian:testing-slim: Debian clang version 14.0.6-2
debian:unstable-slim: Debian clang version 14.0.6-7

fedora:35: clang version 13.0.1 (Fedora 13.0.1-1.fc35)
fedora:latest: clang version 14.0.5 (Fedora 14.0.5-1.fc36)
fedora:rawhide: clang version 15.0.4 (Fedora 15.0.4-1.fc38)

opensuse/leap:15: clang version 13.0.1
opensuse/leap:latest: clang version 13.0.1
opensuse/tumbleweed:latest: clang version 15.0.3

ubuntu:bionic: clang version 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 (tags/RELEASE_600/final)
ubuntu:focal: clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1
ubuntu:latest: Ubuntu clang version 14.0.0-1ubuntu1
ubuntu:kinetic: Ubuntu clang version 15.0.2-1
ubuntu:rolling: Ubuntu clang version 15.0.2-1
ubuntu:devel: Ubuntu clang version 15.0.2-1

At the same time, you are clearly using LLVM 11.0.0, so I think this is a
reasonable fix in the immediate term.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1deff4009e0ae661b03682901bf6932297ce7ea1
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/700baa009dc685a0adc5f94d258be4ae24742471

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> index 60ece592b220..dbb38a6b4dfb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ __PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK(__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath, ".spinlock.text");
>   *   rsi = lockval           (second argument)
>   *   rdx = internal variable (set to 0)
>   */
> -asm    (".pushsection .spinlock.text;"
> +asm    (".pushsection .spinlock.text, \"ax\";"
>  	".globl " PV_UNLOCK ";"
>  	".type " PV_UNLOCK ", @function;"
>  	".align 4,0x90;"
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>