linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2993a60c-edaa-a29a-2644-3ee86c622847@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:09:07 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order

On 11/7/22 04:55, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Ping?
> 
> Also, I managed to remove .head.text at all from x86. Would it be
> better to respin this series with the third patch or send a
> follow-up later?
> 

Hi Alexander,

Things are a bit busy in the review queue at the moment.  As always,
we'd love help reviewing stuff.  So, while you're waiting for us to
review this, could you perhaps look around and find a series that's also
hurting for review tags?