[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <257596884.6156222.1667886713273.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:51:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, cocci@...ia.fr,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
nicolas palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: api: Don't use
devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource with res==NULL
> After uninstalling python2 this ends in:
>
> Cannot find Python library
> coccicheck failed
> make: *** [Makefile:2076: coccicheck] Error 255
>
> Didn't try to debug that any further. Is that worth a bug report against
> coccinelle (which is shipped by my distribution)?
>
> I tried to adapt the org and report modes from other patches in the same
> directory. So a critical glimpse by someone more knowledgable than me is
> recommended. However I don't know how to react to "I doubt ... is
> appropriate", I'd need a more constructive feedback to act on.
I'm not a python expert, so I'm not sure what to do about this python2 vs python3 problem. Is there some strategy for printing that works in both of them?
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists