linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf: Fix memsz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKbZUD3=4qZJJSDf7GfDRnunoJ_RETEi+iuu3oZewENhC+3i_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 06:13:44 +0000
From:   Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, sam@...too.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf: Fix memsz > filesz handling

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 3:59 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the patch! I need to triple-check this logic, as there have
> been some overlapping (or out-of-order) LOAD bugs in the past too, and I
> want to make sure we don't accidentally zero things that already got
> loaded, etc.
Hi Kees,

Thanks for looking at my patch. I've submitted an (unprompted) v2 with
an additional fix for
a loading bug that could load segments after a .bss on top of .bss
itself, which would
overwrite any bss zeroing efforts. Note that this bug was already
present in load_elf_binary.

See a repro at https://github.com/heatd/elf-bug-questionmark, and the
comments on the patch/repro for more info.
Most ELF loading operating systems out there seem to fail on this one.

As for overlapping/out-of-order LOAD segments, what kind of handling
do we want here?
The ELF spec (http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.pheader.html)
says that
"Loadable segment entries in the program header table appear in
ascending order, sorted on the p_vaddr member.",
so do we really want to support that? My -v2 was substantially
simplified based on assuming ELF-compliant executables.

> David, has there been any work on adding a way to instantiate
> userspace VMAs in a KUnit test? I tried to write this myself, but I
> couldn't figure out how to make the userspace memory mappings appear.
> Here's my fumbling attempt:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=devel/kunit/usercopy
>
> I really wish KUnit had userspace mapping support -- I have a bunch of
> unit tests that need to get built up around checking for regressions
> here, etc.
+1 on getting this unit-tested, this is a bit of a minefield

Thanks,
Pedro