linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the erofs-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y2mq6AJgq4OoGkKi@debian>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:03:36 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the erofs-fixes tree

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:34:59AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   40f72c923c28 ("erofs: fix general protection fault when reading fragment")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: 08a0c9ef3e7e ("erofs: support on-disk compressed fragments data")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: b15b2e307c3a ("erofs: support on-disk compressed fragments data")
> 

Thanks for catching this.  It seems it's wrong in the original patch,
let me correct this manually.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell