[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpsPk5uhva2F+=b0r7FeO-8n9+tMAA9iaxGmZZgrtoZUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:18:27 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@...cinc.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Write CONTROL_TCS with next
timer wakeup
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 18:01, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:47:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> [..]
> > 155 #define USECS_TO_CYCLES(time_usecs) \
> > 156 xloops_to_cycles((time_usecs) * 0x10C7UL)
> > 157
> > 158 static inline unsigned long xloops_to_cycles(unsigned long xloops)
>
> Any objections to me changing the type to u64 while applying the
> patches?
No objections. Thanks for making the improvement!
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > 159 {
> > > 160 return (xloops * loops_per_jiffy * HZ) >> 32;
> > 161 }
> > 162
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists