linux-kernel - Re: selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand failed - Bail out! Failed to clear signal handler for child process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtoqQq9xgpEzPL=q7ds5WbudRYikBHEAZAh_25SkPj4ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:51:24 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc:     "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand failed - Bail out! Failed
 to clear signal handler for child process

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 15:34, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:28:55PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand failed on arm32 and i386
> > but passed on arm64 and x86_64.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> >
> > # selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand
> > # TAP version 13
> > # 1..1
> > # # clone3() syscall supported
> > # Bail out! Failed to clear signal handler for child process
> > # # Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0)
> > # # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > not ok 2 selftests: clone3: clone3_clear_sighand # exit=1
> >
> > Test details links,
> > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5820146#L1795
> >
> > Test results comparison link,
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20221107/testrun/12848543/suite/kselftest-clone3/test/clone3.clone3_clear_sighand/history/
>
> Seems before 27 September 2022 this test wasn't run on 32bit instances
> and noone ever noticed?

This email is about sharing the results log and reporting failures.
If you think it is not supported on 32bit the test should SKIP instead of fail.

We have test data available from more than a year,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20221107/testrun/12848543/suite/kselftest-clone3/test/clone3.clone3_clear_sighand/history/?page=13

- Naresh