[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbquWk3F=3CrkSWfWkWFQpzRPPbE3nL+zcuBx57aW4WYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:21:50 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Yassine Oudjana <yassine.oudjana@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl:
Add MT6797
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 5:35 PM Yassine Oudjana
<yassine.oudjana@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
>
> Combine MT6797 pin controller document into MT6779 one. reg and
> reg-names property constraints are set using conditionals.
> A conditional is also used to make interrupt-related properties
> required on the MT6779 pin controller only, since the MT6797
> controller doesn't support interrupts (or not yet, at least).
> drive-strength and slew-rate properties which weren't described
> in the MT6779 document before are brought in from the MT6797 one.
> Both pin controllers share a common driver core so they should
> both support these properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists