linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] UFS Advanced RPMB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ac98bc73cc953f6d1b989eb58bb03257bb5399c.camel@iokpp.de>
Date:   Tue, 08 Nov 2022 13:53:41 +0100
From:   Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        "daejun7.park@...sung.com" <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "quic_cang@...cinc.com" <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com" <quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_richardp@...cinc.com" <quic_richardp@...cinc.com>,
        "quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com" <quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>
Cc:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] UFS Advanced RPMB

On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 12:37 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > In UFS 4.0, it introduced advanced RPMB, which can significantly
> > improve
> > RPMB's command performance, enhancing its atomic operation. We
> > don't
> > know which implementation will please everyone, mark this advanced
> > RPMB
> > patch as RFC. Any suggestions to make the patch a master patch are
> > welcome.
> > Based on suggestions and feedback from Hannes Reinecke and Bart, we
> > can
> > use job_bsg->request and job_bsg->reply to pass EHS packets without
> > changing
> > the BSG V4 structure and BSG core.
> 
> Can you share the reference to this mail thread, or was it a privet
> discussion?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Avri

Avri,

Yes, this is a private discussion during this year's Storage Summit wit
h Hannes Reinecke on the first two proposals below, and a private
discussion with Bart on the following three proposals 


1. Use current BSG v4, and transmit EHS in sense_buffer, which is rejected.

2. The optional suggestion is to use ufs_bsg, which is the patch.

3. New RPMB framework, but we should enable UFS/eMMC RPMB driver as
well in ufs/emmc core, also, the command will be passed to kernel over
ioctl(). interested in this one, But Bart suggested using io_uing
framework. Since RPMB operation is atomic required, we found it is not
safe to use io_uring now, this need passthorugh support SCSI layer as
well.


Kind regards,
Bean