linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 3/8] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: Add flexcom definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:37:50 +0100
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Durai Manickam KR <durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com>,
        <cristian.birsan@...rochip.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <olof@...om.net>,
        <soc@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>,
        <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>, <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 3/8] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: Add flexcom definitions

On 31/10/2022 at 04:36, Durai Manickam KR wrote:
> Add the flexcom definitions to the SoC specifc DTSI file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Durai Manickam KR <durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath <Hari.PrasathGE@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan M <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi
> index ef07d281a3db..fd4f5d43f7bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi

[..]

> @@ -180,6 +190,26 @@ flx5: flexcom@...04000 {
>   				#size-cells = <1>;
>   				ranges = <0x0 0xf0004000 0x800>;
>   				status = "disabled";
> +
> +				uart5: serial@200 {
> +					compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-usart", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart";
> +					reg = <0x200 0x200>;
> +					interrupts = <14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> +					dmas = <&dma0
> +						(AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) |
> +						 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> +						 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(10))>,
> +						<&dma0
> +						(AT91_XDMAC_DT_MEM_IF(0) |
> +						 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PER_IF(1) |
> +						 AT91_XDMAC_DT_PERID(11))>;
> +					dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> +					clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 14>;
> +					clock-names = "usart";
> +					atmel,use-dma-rx;
> +					atmel,use-dma-tx;

Isn't "atmel,fifo-size = <16>;" missing in this added definition?

> +					status = "disabled";
> +				};
>   			};
>   
>   			dma0: dma-controller@...08000 {

[..]

Regards,
   Nicolas

-- 
Nicolas Ferre