linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix memory leak in mount error path when using test_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <215b729e-0af0-45d8-96af-3d3c319581c9@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:08:49 +0800
From:   Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To:     Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix memory leak in mount error path when using
 test_dummy_encryption


On 08/11/2022 22:34, Luís Henriques wrote:
> Because ceph_init_fs_context() will never be invoced in case we get a
> mount error, destroy_mount_options() won't be releasing fscrypt resources
> with fscrypt_free_dummy_policy().  This will result in a memory leak.  Add
> an invocation to this function in the mount error path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
> * Changes since v1:
>
> As suggested by Xiubo, moved fscrypt free from ceph_get_tree() to
> ceph_real_mount().
>
> (Also used 'git format-patch' with '--base' so that the bots know what to
> (not) do with this patch.)
>
>   fs/ceph/super.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c
> index 2224d44d21c0..f10a076f47e5 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,7 @@ static struct dentry *ceph_real_mount(struct ceph_fs_client *fsc,
>   
>   out:
>   	mutex_unlock(&fsc->client->mount_mutex);
> +	ceph_fscrypt_free_dummy_policy(fsc);
>   	return ERR_PTR(err);
>   }
>   
>
> base-commit: 8b9ee21dfceadd4cc35a87bbe7f0ad547cffa1be
> prerequisite-patch-id: 34ba9e6b37b68668d261ddbda7858ee6f83c82fa
> prerequisite-patch-id: 87f1b323c29ab8d0a6d012d30fdc39bc49179624
> prerequisite-patch-id: c94f448ef026375b10748457a3aa46070aa7046e
>
LGTM.

Thanks Luis.

Could I fold this into the previous commit ?

BRs

- Xiubo