linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] KVM: SVM: move MSR_IA32_SPEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALMp9eSrifYwOyPzs3UiUnM7o3iRead5-m5ta4tMo+72Td1y5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 13:23:22 -0800
From:   Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        nathan@...nel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, peterz@...radead.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] KVM: SVM: move MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL save/restore to assembly

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 11:08 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/7/22 19:45, Jim Mattson wrote:
> >> +.macro RESTORE_GUEST_SPEC_CTRL
> >> +       /* No need to do anything if SPEC_CTRL is unset or V_SPEC_CTRL is set */
> >> +       ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp 999f", \
> >> +               "", X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL, \
> >> +               "jmp 999f", X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL
> >> +
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * SPEC_CTRL handling: if the guest's SPEC_CTRL value differs from the
> >> +        * host's, write the MSR.
> >> +        *
> >> +        * IMPORTANT: To avoid RSB underflow attacks and any other nastiness,
> >> +        * there must not be any returns or indirect branches between this code
> >> +        * and vmentry.
> >> +        */
> >> +       movl SVM_spec_ctrl(%_ASM_DI), %eax
> >> +       cmp PER_CPU_VAR(x86_spec_ctrl_current), %eax
> >> +       je 999f
> >> +       mov $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, %ecx
> >> +       xor %edx, %edx
> >> +       wrmsr
> >> +999:
> >> +
> >> +.endm
> >> +
> >> +.macro RESTORE_HOST_SPEC_CTRL
> >> +       /* No need to do anything if SPEC_CTRL is unset or V_SPEC_CTRL is set */
> >> +       ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp 999f", \
> >> +               "", X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL, \
> >> +               "jmp 999f", X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL
> >> +
> >> +       mov $MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, %ecx
> >> +
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * Load the value that the guest had written into MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
> >> +        * if it was not intercepted during guest execution.
> >> +        */
> >> +       cmpb $0, (%_ASM_SP)
> >> +       jnz 998f
> >> +       rdmsr
> >> +       movl %eax, SVM_spec_ctrl(%_ASM_DI)
> >> +998:
> >> +
> >> +       /* Now restore the host value of the MSR if different from the guest's.  */
> >> +       movl PER_CPU_VAR(x86_spec_ctrl_current), %eax
> >> +       cmp SVM_spec_ctrl(%_ASM_DI), %eax
> >> +       je 999f
> >> +       xor %edx, %edx
> >> +       wrmsr
> >> +999:
> >> +
> >> +.endm
> >> +
> >> +
> >
> > It seems unfortunate to have the unconditional branches in the more
> > common cases.
>
> One way to do it could be something like
>
> .macro RESTORE_HOST_SPEC_CTRL
>         ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
>                 "jmp 900f", X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL, \
>                 "", X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL \
> 901:
> .endm
>
> .macro RESTORE_SPEC_CTRL_BODY \
> 800:
>         /* restore guest spec ctrl ... */
>         jmp 801b
>
> 900:
>         /* save guest spec ctrl + restore host ... */
>         jmp 901b
> .endm
>
> The cmp/je pair can also jump back to 801b/901b.
>
> What do you think?  I'll check if objtool is happy and if so include it
> in v2.
>
> Paolo
>
This seems reasonable, if you trust a direct branch prior to the IBPB.