[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110105431.164e411d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:54:31 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
between commit:
4a16dd9d18a0 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch to drm fbdev helpers")
from the drm tree and commits:
9877d8f6bc37 ("drm/fb_helper: Rename field fbdev to info in struct drm_fb_helper")
7fd50bc39d12 ("drm/fb-helper: Rename drm_fb_helper_alloc_fbi() to use _info postfix")
afb0ff78c13c ("drm/fb-helper: Rename drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi() to use _info postfix")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists