[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <820ab144-5841-e3d9-88ec-52093f42be74@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:21:53 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: use common macro for creating simple asm
paravirt functions
On 09.11.22 06:16, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing this patch!
>
> On 10/20/22 2:19 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> There are some paravirt assembler functions which are sharing a common
>> pattern. Introduce a macro DEFINE_PARAVIRT_ASM() for creating them.
>>
>> The explicit _paravirt_nop() prototype in paravirt.c isn't needed, as
>> it is included in paravirt_types.h already.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>
> I just wanted to make a note that the part of this patch that's not
> purely cleanup is the addition of the alignment (__ALIGN_STR) to
> __raw_callee_save___kvm_vcpu_is_preempted(), _paravirt_nop() and
> paravirt_ret0(). Maybe that's worth calling out in the commit message?
I can do that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Thanks,
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists