[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2tiHNLPiAwV6oEn@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:17:32 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
Amarula patchwork <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liang He <windhl@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: ti: add of_ti_clk_register() helper
* Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [221109 08:06]:
> * Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com> [221106 17:36]:
> > The ti_clk_register() function is always called with the parameter of
> > type struct device set to NULL, since the functions from which it is
> > called always have a parameter of type struct device_node. Adding this
> > helper will allow you to register a TI clock to the common clock
> > framework by taking advantage of the facilities provided by the
> > struct device_node type.
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> Do you have a patch to make use of this I can test with?
I mean a patch to convert the ti_clk_register() callers to use this or
what's your plan?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists