[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbt41kLsU7ds+PmaxSb=WbBrqpSmzvjXH98vXg85Mc3xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 10:01:56 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pinctrl: intel: Enable PWM optional feature
On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> I would like to route this via Intel pin control tree with issuing
> an immutable branch for both PINCTRL and PWM subsystems, but I'm
> open for other suggestions.
I'm fine with this approach if it works for Uwe.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists