[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30b8e07970f2cfbba0ebee82aa3b46a047a0f43b.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 11:15:16 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>,
Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: x86: remove exit_int_info warning in
svm_handle_exit
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 15:53 +0000, Liam Merwick wrote:
> On 03/11/2022 14:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > It is valid to receive external interrupt and have broken IDT entry,
> > which will lead to #GP with exit_int_into that will contain the index of
> > the IDT entry (e.g any value).
> >
> > Other exceptions can happen as well, like #NP or #SS
> > (if stack switch fails).
> >
> > Thus this warning can be user triggred and has very little value.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 9 ---------
> > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index e9cec1b692051c..36f651ce842174 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -3428,15 +3428,6 @@ static int svm_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - if (is_external_interrupt(svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info) &&
> > - exit_code != SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR &&
> > - exit_code != SVM_EXIT_NPF && exit_code != SVM_EXIT_TASK_SWITCH &&
> > - exit_code != SVM_EXIT_INTR && exit_code != SVM_EXIT_NMI)
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: unexpected exit_int_info 0x%x "
> > - "exit_code 0x%x\n",
> > - __func__, svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info,
> > - exit_code);
> > -
> > if (exit_fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE)
> > return 1;
> >
>
> This was the only caller of is_external_interrupt() - should the
> definition be removed also to avoid a 'defined but not used' warning?
I hate to say it but I have seen a warning about an unused function,
but I really didn't expect that to come from this patch.
I somehow thought that its some leftover in kvm/queue.
I'll remove the unused function in a next version.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> Regards,
> Liam
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists