[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <115c2f0d-3adb-cbf4-9047-32eb0b461341@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:57:58 -0800
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>, <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
<markgross@...nel.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
<ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
<athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more
appropriate Error code
A nit:
s/return/Return
It might be better to just say:
platform/x86/intel/ifs: Return appropriate error code
On 11/7/2022 2:53 PM, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> scan_chunks_sanity_check() returns -ENOMEM if it encounters
> an error while copying IFS test image from memory to Secure Memory.
>
> Return -EIO in this scenario, as it is more appropriate.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists