lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56cf95b1-68b9-8685-e5af-67eebf046686@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 17:00:43 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, jmattson@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] KVM: SVM: do not allocate struct svm_cpu_data
 dynamically

On 11/9/22 16:58, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> At some point we should replace the vcpu->cpu usage with this_cpu_ptr().  All of
> the code that does per_cpu_ptr(&svm_data, vcpu->cpu) is doomed if vcpu->cpu isn't
> the current CPU.

Yes, I agree with all your other comments but I think they're better 
done in next.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ