linux-kernel - Query on handling some special Group0 interrupt in Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d7b70de6-cd7f-3724-3449-5b838a478277@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:50:35 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To:     <maz@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Query on handling some special Group0 interrupt in Linux

Hi,

I was working on a use case where both el2/el3 are implemented and we 
have a watchdog interrupt (SPI), which is used for detecting software 
hangs and cause device reset; If that interrupt's current cpu affinity 
is on a core, where interrupts are disabled, we won't be able to serve 
it or if this interrupt comes on a core which has interrupt enabled, 
calling panic() or with smp_send_stop(), we would not be able
to know the call stack of the other cores which is running with 
interrupt disabled.

I was thinking of configuring both a watchdog irq(SPI) and IPI_STOP 
(SGI) or any reserve IPI as an FIQ. And from the watchdog irq handler,
I was thinking of calling panic() which eventually sends IPI_STOP(SGI 
FIQ) to all the cores. And with this we will able to dump all the core 
call stack.

I am able to achieve this but wanted to know if this is acceptable to 
the community to support/allow such use cases like above and enable 
group0 interrupt from GIC for some special use cases.

-Mukesh