[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y21BB4Mh4aQjf71c@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:20:55 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+2fdf66e68f5f882c1074@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/kernfs: Fix lockdep warning in kernfs_active()
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:11:34AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > Shouldn't:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y0SwqBsZ9BMmZv6x@slm.duckdns.org fix this
> > instead?
>
> The difference is around whether the id based lookup can see hidden files or
> not. But yeah, it makes more sense to hide it.
So your patch should not have been applied to my tree? And I should
take this one instead?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists