linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/12] perf test: Replace brstack test workload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1036a42b-b438-67b2-c4ca-0e440d266d6d@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:20:25 +0000
From:   German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] perf test: Replace brstack test workload

Hi Namhyung, thanks for doing the refactor, it looks a lot cleaner

On 10/11/2022 18:19, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> So that it can get rid of requirement of a compiler.  Also rename the
> symbols to match with the perf test workload.
>
> Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh | 66 +++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> index ec801cffae6b..a8a182dea25f 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> @@ -4,18 +4,12 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  # German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>, 2022
>  
> -# we need a C compiler to build the test programs
> -# so bail if none is found
> -if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then
> -	echo "failed: no compiler, install gcc"
> -	exit 2
> -fi
> -
>  # skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
>  # and if the architecture doesn't support filter types: any,save_type,u
>  perf record -b -o- -B --branch-filter any,save_type,u true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
>  
>  TMPDIR=$(mktemp -d /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX)
> +TESTPROG="perf test -w brstack"
>  
>  cleanup() {
>  	rm -rf $TMPDIR
> @@ -23,57 +17,24 @@ cleanup() {
>  
>  trap cleanup exit term int
>  
> -gen_test_program() {
> -	# generate test program
> -	cat << EOF > $1
> -#define BENCH_RUNS 999999
> -int cnt;
> -void bar(void) {
> -}			/* return */
> -void foo(void) {
> -	bar();		/* call */
> -}			/* return */
> -void bench(void) {
> -  void (*foo_ind)(void) = foo;
> -  if ((cnt++) % 3)	/* branch (cond) */
> -    foo();		/* call */
> -  bar();		/* call */
> -  foo_ind();		/* call (ind) */
> -}
> -int main(void)
> -{
> -  int cnt = 0;
> -  while (1) {
> -    if ((cnt++) > BENCH_RUNS)
> -      break;
> -    bench();		/* call */
> -  }			/* branch (uncond) */
> -  return 0;
> -}
> -EOF
> -}
> -
>  test_user_branches() {
>  	echo "Testing user branch stack sampling"
>  
> -	gen_test_program "$TEMPDIR/program.c"
> -	cc -fno-inline -g "$TEMPDIR/program.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out
> -
> -	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1
>  	perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
>  
>  	# example of branch entries:
> -	# 	foo+0x14/bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL
> +	# 	brstack_foo+0x14/brstack_bar+0x40/P/-/-/0/CALL
>  
>  	set -x
> -	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^bar\+[^ ]*/foo\+[^ ]*/RET$"		$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^foo\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/RET$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^bench\+[^ ]*/bench\+[^ ]*/COND$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> -	egrep -m1 "^main\+[^ ]*/main\+[^ ]*/UNCOND$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/IND_CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/CALL$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_bar\+[^ ]*/brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/RET$"		$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_foo\+[^ ]*/brstsack_bench\+[^ ]*/RET$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script

Small typo here s/brstsack_bench/brstack_bench

I think James was doing some BRBE work here, so probably best if he also gives his review/test tag.

Acked-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>

> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/brstack_bench\+[^ ]*/COND$"	$TMPDIR/perf.script
> +	egrep -m1 "^brstack\+[^ ]*/brstack\+[^ ]*/UNCOND$"		$TMPDIR/perf.script
>  	set +x
>  
>  	# some branch types are still not being tested:
> @@ -88,10 +49,7 @@ test_filter() {
>  
>  	echo "Testing branch stack filtering permutation ($filter,$expect)"
>  
> -	gen_test_program "$TEMPDIR/program.c"
> -	cc -fno-inline -g "$TEMPDIR/program.c" -o $TMPDIR/a.out
> -
> -	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter $filter,save_type,u -- $TMPDIR/a.out > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter $filter,save_type,u -- ${TESTPROG} > /dev/null 2>&1
>  	perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | xargs -n1 > $TMPDIR/perf.script
>  
>  	# fail if we find any branch type that doesn't match any of the expected ones