[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACueBy4U-MBZx0JwTc0Z5G2iFjBu4wPtdW+bs0aZOr9_QQFv2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:12:15 +0800
From: Chuang W <nashuiliang@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net: tun: rebuild error handling in tun_get_user
Thanks, I will fix these issues and submit again.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:59 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:09:40 +0800 Chuang Wang wrote:
> > The error handling in tun_get_user is very scattered.
> > This patch unifies error handling, reduces duplication of code, and
> > makes the logic clearer.
>
> You're also making some functional changes tho, they at the very least
> need to be enumerated or preferably separate patches.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > index 4bf2b268df4a..5ceec73baf98 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -1742,11 +1742,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> > int good_linear;
> > int copylen;
> > bool zerocopy = false;
> > - int err;
> > + int err = 0;
>
> Don't zero-init the variables like this, instead...
>
> > u32 rxhash = 0;
> > int skb_xdp = 1;
> > bool frags = tun_napi_frags_enabled(tfile);
> > - enum skb_drop_reason drop_reason;
> > + enum skb_drop_reason drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED;
> >
> > if (!(tun->flags & IFF_NO_PI)) {
> > if (len < sizeof(pi))
> > @@ -1808,11 +1808,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> > */
> > skb = tun_build_skb(tun, tfile, from, &gso, len, &skb_xdp);
>
> ... use
>
> err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(skb);
>
> close to the jumps. It's safer to always init err before jumping.
>
> > if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> > - dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > - return PTR_ERR(skb);
> > + err = PTR_ERR(skb);
> > + goto drop;
> > }
> > if (!skb)
> > - return total_len;
> > + goto out;
>
> > if (virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &gso, tun_is_little_endian(tun))) {
> > atomic_long_inc(&tun->rx_frame_errors);
> > - kfree_skb(skb);
>
> now we'll increment error and drop counters, that's not right.
>
> > - if (frags) {
> > - tfile->napi.skb = NULL;
> > - mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > - }
> > -
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto drop;
> > }
>
> > @@ -1952,8 +1932,8 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > if (unlikely(!(tun->dev->flags & IFF_UP))) {
> > - err = -EIO;
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > + err = -EIO;
>
> this change is unnecessary, please refrain from making it
>
> > drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_DEV_READY;
> > goto drop;
> > }
> > @@ -2007,7 +1987,23 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> > if (rxhash)
> > tun_flow_update(tun, rxhash, tfile);
> >
> > - return total_len;
> > + goto out;
>
> keep
>
> return total_len;
>
> that's much easier to read, and there's no concern of err being
> uninitialized.
>
> > +
> > +drop:
> > + if (err != -EAGAIN)
> > + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > +
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(skb))
> > + kfree_skb_reason(skb, drop_reason);
> > +
> > +unlock_frags:
> > + if (frags) {
> > + tfile->napi.skb = NULL;
> > + mutex_unlock(&tfile->napi_mutex);
> > + }
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return err ?: total_len;
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t tun_chr_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists