[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y21oJCFmHjXhncTd@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:07:48 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc: chao@...nel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove gc_urgent_high_remaining node
On 11/10, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I modified and integrated some patches as below. Could you please take a look?
>
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev&id=d34f1e7212c1965a409d4581a32a92a1c91495fc
>
> I've looked at the relevant changes on the branch, looks good to me.
>
> One small question, does the name need to be changed to gc_remaining_count?
> There are already controls based on the number of gcs, maybe we can add a
> gc_remaining_ms later? Control the gc mode based on the expected time. When
> the count is reduced to 0 or the gc ends and the expected value is reached,
> switch back to the normal mode.
Please check the latest patch which replaced it with gc_remaining_trials.
I think the time-based control can be managed by user side instead of kernel.
>
> Thx,
> Yangtao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists