[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <285274e0-51bd-3334-1cb2-3af1b1aa1ba2@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:17:50 -0600
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: PPTT: Remove acpi_find_cache_levels()
On 11/8/22 05:04, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> acpi_find_cache_levels() is used at a single place and is short
> enough to be merged into the calling function. The removal allows
> an easier renaming of the calling function in the next patch.
>
> Also reorder the parameters in the 'reversed Christmas tree' order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
This bit looks fine too:
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 21 ++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index c91342dcbcd6..97c1d33822d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -281,19 +281,6 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_node(struct acpi_table_he
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static int acpi_find_cache_levels(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> - u32 acpi_cpu_id)
> -{
> - int number_of_levels = 0;
> - struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu;
> -
> - cpu = acpi_find_processor_node(table_hdr, acpi_cpu_id);
> - if (cpu)
> - number_of_levels = acpi_count_levels(table_hdr, cpu);
> -
> - return number_of_levels;
> -}
> -
> static u8 acpi_cache_type(enum cache_type type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> @@ -613,9 +600,10 @@ static int check_acpi_cpu_flag(unsigned int cpu, int rev, u32 flag)
> */
> int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - u32 acpi_cpu_id;
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> struct acpi_table_header *table;
> int number_of_levels = 0;
> + u32 acpi_cpu_id;
>
> table = acpi_get_pptt();
> if (!table)
> @@ -624,7 +612,10 @@ int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> pr_debug("Cache Setup find last level CPU=%d\n", cpu);
>
> acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> - number_of_levels = acpi_find_cache_levels(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> + if (cpu_node)
> + number_of_levels = acpi_count_levels(table, cpu_node);
> +
> pr_debug("Cache Setup find last level level=%d\n", number_of_levels);
>
> return number_of_levels;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists