lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:40:09 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the perf tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  tools/perf/util/stat.c

between commit:

  8b76a3188b85 ("perf stat: Remove unused perf_counts.aggr field")

from the perf tree and commit:

  c302378bc157 ("libbpf: Hashmap interface update to allow both long and void* keys/values")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/perf/util/stat.c
index 3a432a949d46,c0656f85bfa5..000000000000
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
@@@ -318,7 -258,27 +318,7 @@@ void evlist__copy_prev_raw_counts(struc
  		evsel__copy_prev_raw_counts(evsel);
  }
  
- static size_t pkg_id_hash(const void *__key, void *ctx __maybe_unused)
 -void evlist__save_aggr_prev_raw_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
 -{
 -	struct evsel *evsel;
 -
 -	/*
 -	 * To collect the overall statistics for interval mode,
 -	 * we copy the counts from evsel->prev_raw_counts to
 -	 * evsel->counts. The perf_stat_process_counter creates
 -	 * aggr values from per cpu values, but the per cpu values
 -	 * are 0 for AGGR_GLOBAL. So we use a trick that saves the
 -	 * previous aggr value to the first member of perf_counts,
 -	 * then aggr calculation in process_counter_values can work
 -	 * correctly.
 -	 */
 -	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
 -		*perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, 0, 0) =
 -			evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr;
 -	}
 -}
 -
+ static size_t pkg_id_hash(long __key, void *ctx __maybe_unused)
  {
  	uint64_t *key = (uint64_t *) __key;
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ