[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f1ad424-18b0-c27f-dbf6-745801182bd2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:39:53 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
harshit.m.mogalapalli@...il.com,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] iommu/vt-d: set default value of INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA to n
On 2022/11/10 4:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 2022/11/9 20:16, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/11/22 12:35 pm, Baolu Lu wrote:
>>>> On 2022/11/8 20:58, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>>>>> It is likely that modern intel motherboard will not ship with a
>>>>> floppy connection anymore, so let us disable it by default, as it
>>>>> gets turned on when we do a make defconfig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>>> index b7dff5092fd2..c783ae85ca9b 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_BROKEN_GFX_WA
>>>>> option is removed in the 2.6.32 kernel.
>>>>> config INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
>>>>> - def_bool y
>>>>> + def_bool n
>>>>> depends on X86
>>>>> help
>>>>> Floppy disk drivers are known to bypass DMA API calls
>>>>
>>>> Nobody selects or depends on this. How about removing this bool? Only
>>>> less than 10 lines of code are impacted and are not in any performance
>>>> path.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>> index b7dff5092fd2..5e077d1c5f5d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -75,15 +75,6 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_BROKEN_GFX_WA
>>>> to use physical addresses for DMA, at least until this
>>>> option is removed in the 2.6.32 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> -config INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
>>>> - def_bool y
>>>> - depends on X86
>>>> - help
>>>> - Floppy disk drivers are known to bypass DMA API calls
>>>> - thereby failing to work when IOMMU is enabled. This
>>>> - workaround will setup a 1:1 mapping for the first
>>>> - 16MiB to make floppy (an ISA device) work.
>>>> -
>>>> config INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON
>>>> bool "Enable Intel IOMMU scalable mode by default"
>>>> default y
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> index 48cdcd0a5cf3..22801850f339 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>>> @@ -4567,7 +4567,6 @@ static void
>>>> intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *device,
>>>> }
>>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
>>>> if (dev_is_pci(device)) {
>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
>>>>
>>>> @@ -4579,7 +4578,6 @@ static void
>>>> intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *device,
>>>> list_add_tail(®->list, head);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> -#endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA */
>>>>
>>>> reg = iommu_alloc_resv_region(IOAPIC_RANGE_START,
>>>> IOAPIC_RANGE_END - IOAPIC_RANGE_START + 1,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Baolu,
>>>
>>> I have a question:
>>> Shouldn't we remove the code between ifdef-endif statements?
>>>
>>> I mean something like this:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> index b7dff5092fd2..5e077d1c5f5d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/Kconfig
>>> @@ -75,15 +75,6 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_BROKEN_GFX_WA
>>> to use physical addresses for DMA, at least until this
>>> option is removed in the 2.6.32 kernel.
>>>
>>> -config INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
>>> - def_bool y
>>> - depends on X86
>>> - help
>>> - Floppy disk drivers are known to bypass DMA API calls
>>> - thereby failing to work when IOMMU is enabled. This
>>> - workaround will setup a 1:1 mapping for the first
>>> - 16MiB to make floppy (an ISA device) work.
>>> -
>>> config INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON
>>> bool "Enable Intel IOMMU scalable mode by default"
>>> default y
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> index 48cdcd0a5cf3..2c416ad3204e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> @@ -4567,20 +4567,6 @@ static void intel_iommu_get_resv_regions(struct
>>> device *device,
>>> }
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA
>>> - if (dev_is_pci(device)) {
>>> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
>>> -
>>> - if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA) {
>>> - reg = iommu_alloc_resv_region(0, 1UL << 24, prot,
>>> - IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT_RELAXABLE,
>>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (reg)
>>> - list_add_tail(®->list, head);
>>> - }
>>> - }
>>> -#endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_FLOPPY_WA */
>>> -
>>> reg = iommu_alloc_resv_region(IOAPIC_RANGE_START,
>>> IOAPIC_RANGE_END -
>>> IOAPIC_RANGE_START + 1,
>>> 0, IOMMU_RESV_MSI, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> This code is introduced in Commit d850c2ee5fe2 ("iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA
>>> direct mapping region via iommu_get_resv_regions")
>>
>> As long as floppy driver exists in the tree, we have to include above
>> code. Otherwise, floppy drivers don't work. At least we can easily find
>> drivers/block/floppy.c which is still maintained (check MAINTAINERS).:-)
>
> But this requires a machine with Intel IOMMU and ISA:
>
>>>> - 16MiB to make floppy (an ISA device) work.
>
> ISA device? I don't believe there are any Intel machines with an IOMMU
> and an ISA device?
This workaround was introduced by commit 49a0429e53f2 ("Intel IOMMU:
Iommu floppy workaround") in 2007. I can't remember what happened 15
years ago, but I believe there must have been corresponding hardware
configurations at that time, and the Linux kernel has been maintained it
to now.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists