[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221109160243.0db030ca1cbae5f180af3855@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:02:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: proc: Fix proc-empty-vm build error
on non x86_64
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 22:11:03 +0000 Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com> wrote:
> The proc-empty-vm test is implemented for x86_64 and fails to build
> for other architectures. Rather then emitting a compiler error it
> would be preferable to only build the test on supported architectures.
Why does it fail? What would be involved in making it available
on other architectures?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists