lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 23:27:21 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     A <amit.general.misc@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Submitting patches without using git.

Hi--

On 11/9/22 21:22, A wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is learning git necessary to submit patches to linux kernel?

No.
Simple patches or small patch series don't need to use git.
As patches become more complex, git could be more of an advantage.

> Can I do it without git?

Sure. For me it's easiest to use 'git send-email', which doesn't require git,
but I have also done it just using an email client (Thunderbird in my case).

(git send-mail may require a separate software installation depending on your
distro and its packaging.)


> I have used SVN, etc. but I found git a little bit complex.


-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ