[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110080147.bpfumiab2yt7nehf@sgarzare-redhat>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:01:47 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
gautam.dawar@...inx.com, elic@...dia.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vdpa_sim: fix possible memory leak in
vdpasim_net_init() and vdpasim_blk_init()
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:04:46PM +0800, ruanjinjie wrote:
>Inject fault while probing module, if device_register() fails in
>vdpasim_net_init() or vdpasim_blk_init(), but the refcount of kobject is
>not decreased to 0, the name allocated in dev_set_name() is leaked.
>Fix this by calling put_device(), so that name can be freed in
>callback function kobject_cleanup().
>
>(vdpa_sim_net)
>unreferenced object 0xffff88807eebc370 (size 16):
> comm "modprobe", pid 3848, jiffies 4362982860 (age 18.153s)
> hex dump (first 16 bytes):
> 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 6e 65 74 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_net.kkk.
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150
> [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60
> [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110
> [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
> [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80
> [<ffffffffa0270013>] 0xffffffffa0270013
> [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0
> [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640
> [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0
> [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0
> [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
>(vdpa_sim_blk)
>unreferenced object 0xffff8881070c1250 (size 16):
> comm "modprobe", pid 6844, jiffies 4364069319 (age 17.572s)
> hex dump (first 16 bytes):
> 76 64 70 61 73 69 6d 5f 62 6c 6b 00 6b 6b 6b a5 vdpasim_blk.kkk.
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff8174f19e>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x150
> [<ffffffff81731d53>] kstrdup+0x33/0x60
> [<ffffffff83a5d421>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x41/0x110
> [<ffffffff82d87aab>] dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0
> [<ffffffff82d91a23>] device_add+0xe3/0x1a80
> [<ffffffffa0220013>] 0xffffffffa0220013
> [<ffffffff81001c27>] do_one_initcall+0x87/0x2e0
> [<ffffffff813739cb>] do_init_module+0x1ab/0x640
> [<ffffffff81379d20>] load_module+0x5d00/0x77f0
> [<ffffffff8137bc40>] __do_sys_finit_module+0x110/0x1b0
> [<ffffffff83c4d505>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> [<ffffffff83e0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
>
>Signed-off-by: ruanjinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>---
>v2:
>- add fault inject message
>---
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks for the v2 of this patch!
It LGTM, just a couple of comments about the submit process.
Usually when you get A-b R-b's and the patch doesn't change, it's better
to bring them in later versions.
Also, we had suggested reporting the Fixes tag, because usually when we
fix a bug it's good to identify which patch introduced the problem, so
it's easier to backport this fix into stable versions of the kernel.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
In this case we should use the following tags:
Fixes: 899c4d187f6a ("vdpa_sim_blk: add support for vdpa management tool")
Fixes: a3c06ae158dd ("vdpa_sim_net: Add support for user supported devices")
With them:
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists