[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110093120.udcpeer5paqbhxzn@houat>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:31:20 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>,
Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek+publicgit@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/23] drm/modes: Properly generate a drm_display_mode
from a named mode
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:49:57PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Den 07.11.2022 15.16, skrev Maxime Ripard:
> > The framework will get the drm_display_mode from the drm_cmdline_mode it
> > got by parsing the video command line argument by calling
> > drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode().
> >
> > The heavy lifting will then be done by the drm_mode_create_from_cmdline_mode()
> > function.
> >
> > In the case of the named modes though, there's no real code to make that
> > translation and we rely on the drivers to guess which actual display mode
> > we meant.
> >
> > Let's modify drm_mode_create_from_cmdline_mode() to properly generate the
> > drm_display_mode we mean when passing a named mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Use tv_mode_specified in drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Fix get_modes to return 0 instead of an error code
> > - Rename the tests to follow the DRM test naming convention
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Switched to KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 34 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > index dc037f7ceb37..49441cabdd9d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> > @@ -2497,6 +2497,36 @@ bool drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(const char *mode_option,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector);
> >
> > +static struct drm_display_mode *drm_named_mode(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmd)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(drm_named_modes); i++) {
> > + const struct drm_named_mode *named_mode = &drm_named_modes[i];
> > +
> > + if (strcmp(cmd->name, named_mode->name))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!cmd->tv_mode_specified)
> > + continue;
>
> Only a named mode will set cmd->name, so is this check necessary?
Yeah, but (and even though it's not the case at the moment) there's no
implication that a named mode will be about TV. We could use it for
VGA/XGA/etc just as well, in which case we wouldn't have
tv_mode_specified.
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists