[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y2zLYDmO1fkOmFgw@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:59:15 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com, markgross@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ashok.raj@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, thiago.macieira@...el.com,
athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com, sohil.mehta@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] IFS multi test image support and misc changes
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:53:09PM -0800, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> Changes in v2
> - Rebased ontop of v6.1-rc4
> Boris
> - Moved exported functions (microcode_sanity_check(),
> find_matching_signature ) from microcode/intel.c to cpu/intel.c
> (patch4,6)
> - Removed microcode metadata specific code changes to
> microcode_sanity_check() (patch6)
> - Moved find_meta_data() from common to IFS driver (Patch 8)
What's the upstreaming plan here - I'm assuming I should take the
microcode patches through the tip tree?
Or should I take the whole thing through tip so that there's no
confusion and having to sync and share branches between trees?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists