linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] ACPI: container: Add power domain control methods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <91e13efd-2de9-6fa1-188f-ec74958fff99@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:13:23 +0800
From:   "zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     <lenb@...nel.org>, <patchwork@...wei.com>,
        <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        <wanghuiqiang@...wei.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ACPI: container: Add power domain control methods

Kindly ping.

在 2022/10/29 1:07, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:17 AM Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@...wei.com> wrote:
>> Platform devices which supports power control are often required to be
>> power off/on together with the devices in the same power domain. However,
>> there isn't a generic driver that support the power control logic of
>> these devices.
> Not true.
>
> There is the ACPI power resources interface designed to represent
> power domains that is well supported and used in the industry.
>
> If it doesn't work for you, explain why.
>