[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110134918.GB3436769-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:49:18 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@...1solutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: add YAML schema for the sl28
vpd layout
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:38:31PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>
> Add a schema for the NVMEM layout on Kontron's sl28 boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> ---
> .../nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/nvmem/layouts/nvmem-layout.yaml | 3 +
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..44088c8b4153
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/layouts/kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NVMEM layout of the Kontron SMARC-sAL28 vital product data
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> +
> +description:
> + The vital product data (VPD) of the sl28 boards contains a serial
> + number and a base MAC address. The actual MAC addresses for the
> + on-board ethernet devices are derived from this base MAC address by
> + adding an offset.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: kontron,sl28-vpd
> +
> + serial-number:
> + type: object
> + description: The board's serial number
> +
> + base-mac-address:
> + type: object
> + description:
> + Base MAC address for all on-module network interfaces. The first
> + argument of the phandle will be treated as an offset.
> +
> + properties:
> + "#nvmem-cell-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + additionalProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + otp-1 {
> + compatible = "user-otp";
> +
> + nvmem-layout {
> + compatible = "kontron,sl28-vpd";
> +
> + serial_number: serial-number {
> + };
> +
> + base_mac_address: base-mac-address {
> + #nvmem-cell-cells = <1>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> +...
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/nvmem-layout.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/nvmem-layout.yaml
> index ecc7c37cbc1f..f64ea2fa362d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/nvmem-layout.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/layouts/nvmem-layout.yaml
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ description: |
> define and might require dynamic reading of the NVMEM device in order to
> perform their parsing. The nvmem-layout container is here to describe these.
>
> +oneOf:
> + - $ref: kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml
This is the other way around from how we normally structure things.
Normally, the specific schema would reference the common/base schema.
This works, though you will be applying the schema twice. Once here and
then by matching on compatible string. Not a big deal as that happens
fairly often, but a 'select: false' in kontron,sl28-vpd.yaml would
prevent that. This way does more to enforce the overall structure of
nodes.
The one downside I see with it this way is nvmem-layout can't ever have
common properties defined without listing them in each layout schema.
In the end, I'm okay with either way.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists