[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y20DHLQiRU3i7UTC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:56:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] gpiolib: of: Prepare of_mm_gpiochip_add_data()
for fwnode
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:19:30PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > - of_node_put(mm_gc->gc.of_node);
> > - mm_gc->gc.of_node = of_node_get(np);
> > + fwnode_handle_put(mm_gc->gc.fwnode);
> > + mm_gc->gc.fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(fwnode);
>
> Can we reduce the patch to
>
> fwnode_handle_put(mm_gc->gc.fwnode);
> mm_gc->gc.fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(of_fwnode_handle(np));
>
> ?
Sure. As Linus pointed out, it's anyway temporary.
> I do not see a reason for converting the rest of invocations to fwnode
> given that this is clearly an OF API.
...which should go away.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists